On 12/16/2016 11:53 PM, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> Hi Mike
>
>> --- a/arch/sparc/mm/hugetlbpage.c
>> +++ b/arch/sparc/mm/hugetlbpage.c
>> @@ -162,8 +162,14 @@ void set_huge_pte_at(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr,
>> {
>> pte_t orig;
>>
>> - if (!pte_present(*ptep) && pte_present(entry))
>> - mm->context.hugetlb_pte_count++;
>> + if (!pte_present(*ptep) && pte_present(entry)) {
>> +#if defined(CONFIG_SHARED_MMU_CTX)
>> + if (pte_val(entry) | _PAGE_SHR_CTX_4V)
>> + mm->context.shared_hugetlb_pte_count++;
>> + else
>> +#endif
>> + mm->context.hugetlb_pte_count++;
>> + }
>
> This kind of conditional code it just too ugly to survive...
> Could a static inline be used to help you here?
> The compiler will inline it so there should not be any run-time cost
Yes, this can be cleaned up in that way.
>
>>
>> mm_rss -= saved_thp_pte_count * (HPAGE_SIZE / PAGE_SIZE);
>> #endif
>> @@ -544,8 +576,10 @@ int init_new_context(struct task_struct *tsk, struct mm_struct *mm)
>> * us, so we need to zero out the TSB pointer or else tsb_grow()
>> * will be confused and think there is an older TSB to free up.
>> */
>> - for (i = 0; i < MM_NUM_TSBS; i++)
>> + for (i = 0; i < MM_NUM_TSBS; i++) {
>> mm->context.tsb_block[i].tsb = NULL;
>> + mm->context.tsb_descr[i].tsb_base = 0UL;
>> + }
> This change seems un-related to the rest?
Correct. I was experimenting with some other ways of managing the tsb_descr
array that got dropped, but forgot to remove this.
--
Mike Kravetz
>
> Sam
>
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>