[PATCH 10/42] userfaultfd: non-cooperative: dup_userfaultfd: use mm_count instead of mm_users

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Since commit d2005e3f41d4 (userfaultfd: don't pin the user memory in
userfaultfd_file_create()) userfaultfd uses mm_count rather than mm_users
to pin mm_struct. Make dup_userfaultfd consistent with this behaviour

Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 fs/userfaultfd.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/userfaultfd.c b/fs/userfaultfd.c
index 6fe0efd..9bb7caf 100644
--- a/fs/userfaultfd.c
+++ b/fs/userfaultfd.c
@@ -525,7 +525,7 @@ int dup_userfaultfd(struct vm_area_struct *vma, struct list_head *fcs)
 		ctx->features = octx->features;
 		ctx->released = false;
 		ctx->mm = vma->vm_mm;
-		atomic_inc(&ctx->mm->mm_users);
+		atomic_inc(&ctx->mm->mm_count);
 
 		userfaultfd_ctx_get(octx);
 		fctx->orig = octx;

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]