On Fri 09-12-16 17:58:14, Gerhard Wiesinger wrote: > On 09.12.2016 17:09, Michal Hocko wrote: [...] > > > [97883.882611] Mem-Info: > > > [97883.883747] active_anon:2915 inactive_anon:3376 isolated_anon:0 > > > active_file:3902 inactive_file:3639 isolated_file:0 > > > unevictable:0 dirty:205 writeback:0 unstable:0 > > > slab_reclaimable:9856 slab_unreclaimable:9682 > > > mapped:3722 shmem:59 pagetables:2080 bounce:0 > > > free:748 free_pcp:15 free_cma:0 > > there is still some page cache which doesn't seem to be neither dirty > > nor under writeback. So it should be theoretically reclaimable but for > > some reason we cannot seem to reclaim that memory. > > There is still some anonymous memory and free swap so we could reclaim > > it as well but it all seems pretty down and the memory pressure is > > really large > > Yes, it might be large on the update situation, but that should be handled > by a virtual memory system by the kernel, right? Well this is what we try and call it memory reclaim. But if we are not able to reclaim anything then we eventually have to give up and trigger the OOM killer. Now the information that 4.4 made a difference is interesting. I do not really see any major differences in the reclaim between 4.3 and 4.4 kernels. The reason might be somewhere else as well. E.g. some of the subsystem consumes much more memory than before. Just curious, what kind of filesystem are you using? Could you try some additional debugging. Enabling reclaim related tracepoints might tell us more. The following should tell us more mount -t tracefs none /trace echo 1 > /trace/events/vmscan/enable echo 1 > /trace/events/writeback/writeback_congestion_wait/enable cat /trace/trace_pipe > trace.log Collecting /proc/vmstat over time might be helpful as well mkdir logs while true do cp /proc/vmstat vmstat.$(date +%s) sleep 1s done -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>