Re: mlockall() with pid parameter

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 12/07/2016 04:39 PM, Federico Reghenzani wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> I'm working on Real-Time applications in Linux. `mlockall()` is a
> typical syscall used in RT processes in order to avoid page faults.
> However, the use of this syscall is strongly limited by ulimits, so
> basically all RT processes that want to call `mlockall()` have to be
> executed with root privileges.

Is it not possible to change the ulimits with e.g. prlimit?

> What I would like to have is a syscall that accept a "pid", so a process
> spawned by root would be able to enforce the memory locking to other
> non-root processes. The prototypes would be:
> 
> int mlockall(int flags, pid_t pid);
> int munlockall(pid_t pid);
> 
> I checked the source code and it seems to me quite easy to add this
> syscall variant.
> 
> I'm writing here to have a feedback before starting to edit the code. Do
> you think that this is a good approach?
> 
> 
> Thank you,
> Federico
> 
> -- 
> *Federico Reghenzani*
> PhD Candidate
> Politecnico di Milano
> Dipartimento di Elettronica, Informazione e Bioingegneria
> 

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]