On 12/02/2016 10:57 AM, Lucas Stach wrote:
There are a lot of reasons why a PFN might be busy and unable to be isolated
some of which can't really be avoided. This message is spamming the logs when
a lot of CMA allocations are happening, causing isolation to happen quite
frequently.
Is this related to Robin's report [1] or you have an independent case of
lots of CMA allocations, and in which context are there?
Demote the message to log level, as CMA will just retry the allocation, so
there is no need to have this message in the logs. If someone is interested
in the failing case, there is a tracepoint to track those failures properly.
I don't think we should just hide the issue like this, as getting high
volume reports from this is also very likely associated with high
overhead for the allocations. If it's the generic dma-cma context, like
in [1] where it attempts CMA for order-0 allocations, we should first do
something about that, before tweaking the logging.
[1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-mm&m=148053714627617&w=2
Signed-off-by: Lucas Stach <l.stach@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
mm/page_alloc.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
index 2b3bf6767d54..b2cfb4074f90 100644
--- a/mm/page_alloc.c
+++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
@@ -7398,7 +7398,7 @@ int alloc_contig_range(unsigned long start, unsigned long end,
/* Make sure the range is really isolated. */
if (test_pages_isolated(outer_start, end, false)) {
- pr_info("%s: [%lx, %lx) PFNs busy\n",
+ pr_debug("%s: [%lx, %lx) PFNs busy\n",
__func__, outer_start, end);
ret = -EBUSY;
goto done;
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>