On 11/29/2016 05:38 PM, Tejun Heo wrote:
On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 08:25:07AM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
--- a/include/linux/gfp.h
+++ b/include/linux/gfp.h
@@ -246,7 +246,7 @@ struct vm_area_struct;
#define GFP_ATOMIC (__GFP_HIGH|__GFP_ATOMIC|__GFP_KSWAPD_RECLAIM)
#define GFP_KERNEL (__GFP_RECLAIM | __GFP_IO | __GFP_FS)
#define GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT (GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_ACCOUNT)
-#define GFP_NOWAIT (__GFP_KSWAPD_RECLAIM)
+#define GFP_NOWAIT (__GFP_KSWAPD_RECLAIM|__GFP_NOWARN)
#define GFP_NOIO (__GFP_RECLAIM)
#define GFP_NOFS (__GFP_RECLAIM | __GFP_IO)
#define GFP_TEMPORARY (__GFP_RECLAIM | __GFP_IO | __GFP_FS | \
this will not catch users who are doing gfp & ~__GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM but
I would rather not make warn_alloc() even more cluttered with checks.
Yeah, FWIW, looks good to me.
Me too. Just don't forget to update the comment describing GFP_NOWAIT and check
the existing users if duplicite __GFP_NOWARN can be removed, and if they really
want to be doing GFP_NOWAIT and not GFP_ATOMIC.
Also dunno what about Tejun's eariler patch.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>