Le vendredi 19 novembre 2010 Ã 09:42 -0600, Christoph Lameter a Ãcrit :
> On Wed, 17 Nov 2010, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>
> > diff --git a/include/linux/highmem.h b/include/linux/highmem.h
> > index b676c58..bb5db26 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/highmem.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/highmem.h
> > @@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ static inline int kmap_atomic_idx_push(void)
> >
> > static inline int kmap_atomic_idx(void)
> > {
> > - return __get_cpu_var(__kmap_atomic_idx) - 1;
> > + return __this_cpu_read(__kmap_atomic_idx) - 1;
> > }
> >
> > static inline int kmap_atomic_idx_pop(void)
>
> This isnt a use case for this_cpu_dec right? Seems that your message was
> cut off?
>
I wanted to show you the file were it was possible to use this_cpu_{dec|
inc}_return()
My patch on kmap_atomic_idx() doesnt need your new functions ;)
Thanks
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom policy in Canada: sign http://dissolvethecrtc.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>