On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 03:16:21PM +0900, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote: > I haven't seen this patch series carefully yet. So, probably > my question is dumb. Why don't we need to change ->recent_scanned[] too? That one is taken care by the prev patch where it is increased by 512 through nr_taken (after the previous patch the isolation methods now return in 4k units). What was left to update was the nr_rotated++ which is why this patch isn't touching the recent_scanned. Andrea -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom policy in Canada: sign http://dissolvethecrtc.ca/ Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>