On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 12:59 AM, Nick Piggin <npiggin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > FWIW, we can just add this to the new shrinker API, and convert over > the users who care about it, so it doesn't have to be done in a big > patch. I also don't like that adding a shrinker parameter requires trivial changes in every place that defines a shrinker. I was wondering, could we just add a new structure for shrinker parameters ? Your proposal of having parallel 'old' and 'new' APIs works if this is a one-time change, but seems awkward if we want to add additional parameters later on... -- Michel "Walken" Lespinasse A program is never fully debugged until the last user dies. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom policy in Canada: sign http://dissolvethecrtc.ca/ Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>