Re: [PATCH/RFC v2] z3fold: use per-page read/write lock

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 01:58:34PM +0100, Vitaly Wool wrote:
> Most of z3fold operations are in-page, such as modifying z3fold
> page header or moving z3fold objects within a page. Taking
> per-pool spinlock to protect per-page objects is therefore
> suboptimal, and the idea of having a per-page spinlock (or rwlock)
> has been around for some time. However, adding one directly to the
> z3fold header makes the latter quite big on some systems so that
> it won't fit in a signle chunk.
> 
> This patch implements spinlock-based per-page locking mechanism
> which is lightweight enough to fit into the z3fold header.
> 
> Changes from v1 [1]:
> - custom locking mechanism changed to spinlocks
> - no read/write locks, just per-page spinlock

Looks good.

BTW the spinlock could still grow when debug options  like
lockdep are enabled. So something would still need to be done about
that BUILD_BUG_ON(). Otherwise would need to force a raw spin lock.

-Andi

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]