On Wed 17-11-10 12:28:01, Daisuke Nishimura wrote: > On Tue, 16 Nov 2010 17:12:25 -0800 > Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Wed, 17 Nov 2010 09:23:39 +0900 Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt b/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt > > > > > index ed45e98..14eafa5 100644 > > > > > --- a/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt > > > > > +++ b/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt > > > > > @@ -2385,6 +2385,9 @@ and is between 256 and 4096 characters. It is defined in the file > > > > > improve throughput, but will also increase the > > > > > amount of memory reserved for use by the client. > > > > > > > > > > + swapaccount [KNL] Enable accounting of swap in memory resource > > > > > + controller. (See Documentation/cgroups/memory.txt) > > > > > > > > So we have swapaccount and noswapaccount. Ho hum, "swapaccount=[1|0]" > > > > would have been better. > > > > > > > I suggested to keep "noswapaccount" for compatibility. > > > If you and other guys don't like having two parameters, I don't stick to > > > the old parameter. > > > > > > > Yes, we're stuck with the old one now. > > > > But we should note that "foo=[0|1]" is superior to "foo" and "nofoo". > > Even if we didn't initially intend to add "nofoo". > > > I see. > > Michal-san, could you update your patch to use "swapaccount=[1|0]" ? I have noticed that Andrew has already taken the last version of the patch for -mm tree. Should I still rework it to change swapaccount to swapaccount=0|1 resp. true|false? > > Thanks, > Daisuke Nishimura. -- Michal Hocko L3 team SUSE LINUX s.r.o. Lihovarska 1060/12 190 00 Praha 9 Czech Republic -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom policy in Canada: sign http://dissolvethecrtc.ca/ Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>