Vitaly Wool <vitalywool@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > Most of z3fold operations are in-page, such as modifying z3fold > page header or moving z3fold objects within a page. Taking > per-pool spinlock to protect per-page objects is therefore > suboptimal, and the idea of having a per-page spinlock (or rwlock) > has been around for some time. However, adding one directly to the > z3fold header makes the latter quite big on some systems so that > it won't fit in a signle chunk. > + atomic_t page_lock; This doesnt make much sense. A standard spinlock is not bigger than 4 bytes either. Also reinventing locks is usually a bad idea: they are tricky to get right, you have no debugging support, hard to analyze, etc. -Andi -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>