On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 12:14:07PM +0800, Shaohui Zheng wrote: > On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 01:10:50PM -0800, David Rientjes wrote: > > The idea that I've proposed (and you've apparently thought about and even > > implemented at one point) is much more powerful than that. We need not > > query the state of hidden nodes that we've setup at boot but can rather > > use the amount of hidden memory to setup the nodes in any way that we want > > at runtime (various sizes, interleaved node ids, etc). > > yes, if we select your proposal. we just mark all the nodes as POSSIBLE node. > there is no hidden nodes any more. the node will be created after add memory > to the node first time. > This is roughly what I had in mind in my N_HIDDEN review, so I quite favour this approach. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom policy in Canada: sign http://dissolvethecrtc.ca/ Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>