Re: [PATCH 0/8] Use memory compaction instead of lumpy reclaim during high-order allocations

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 11/17/2010 06:46 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Wed, 17 Nov 2010 16:22:41 +0000
Mel Gorman<mel@xxxxxxxxx>  wrote:

I'm hoping that this series also removes the
necessity for the "delete lumpy reclaim" patch from the THP tree.

Now I'm sad.  I read all that and was thinking "oh goody, we get to
delete something for once".  But no :(

If you can get this stuff to work nicely, why can't we remove lumpy
reclaim?

I seem to remember there being some resistance against
removing lumpy reclaim, but I do not remember from
where or why.

IMHO some code deletion would be nice :)

--
All rights reversed

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom policy in Canada: sign http://dissolvethecrtc.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]