On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 10:11:43AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: > I don't think ->page_mkwrite can be worked around - we need that to > be called on the first write fault of any mmap()d page to ensure it > is set up correctly for writeback. If we don't get write faults > after the page is mlock()d, then we need the ->page_mkwrite() call > during the mlock() call. OK, so I'm not an mm hacker, so maybe I'm missing something. Could part of this be fixed by simply sending the write faults for mlock()'ed pages, so page_mkwrite() gets called when the page is dirtied. Seems like a real waste to have the file system pre-allocate all of the blocks for a mlock()'ed region. Why does mlock() have to result in the write faults getting suppressed when the page is actually dirtied? - Ted -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom policy in Canada: sign http://dissolvethecrtc.ca/ Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>