Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86/vdso: set vdso pointer only after success

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 7:15 AM, Dmitry Safonov <dsafonov@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Those pointers were initialized before call to _install_special_mapping
> after the commit f7b6eb3fa072 ("x86: Set context.vdso before installing
> the mapping"). This is not required anymore as special mappings have
> their vma name and don't use arch_vma_name() after commit a62c34bd2a8a
> ("x86, mm: Improve _install_special_mapping and fix x86 vdso naming").
> So, this way to init looks less entangled.
> I even belive, we can remove null initializers:
> - on failure load_elf_binary() will not start a new thread;
> - arch_prctl will have the same pointers as before syscall.

Acked-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxx>

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]