Re: [PATCHv4 18/43] block: define BIO_MAX_PAGES to HPAGE_PMD_NR if huge page cache enabled

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 12:21:22AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 03:13:17AM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > We are going to do IO a huge page a time. So we need BIO_MAX_PAGES to be
> > at least HPAGE_PMD_NR. For x86-64, it's 512 pages.
> 
> NAK.  The maximum bio size should not depend on an obscure vm config,
> please send a standalone patch increasing the size to the block list,
> with a much long explanation.  Also you can't simply increase the size
> of the largers pool, we'll probably need more pools instead, or maybe
> even implement a similar chaining scheme as we do for struct
> scatterlist.

The size of required pool depends on architecture: different architectures
has different (huge page size)/(base page size).

Would it be okay if I add one more pool with size equal to HPAGE_PMD_NR,
if it's bigger than than BIO_MAX_PAGES and huge pages are enabled?

-- 
 Kirill A. Shutemov

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]