Re: mmap_sem bottleneck

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 04:50:10PM +0200, Laurent Dufour wrote:
> On 17/10/2016 14:51, Peter Zijlstra wrote:

> > Latest version is here:
> > 
> >   https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20141020215633.717315139@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > 
> > Plenty of bits left to sort with that, but the general idea is to use
> > the split page-table locks (PTLs) as range lock for the mmap_sem.
> 
> Thanks Peter for the pointer,
> 
> It sounds that some parts of this series are already upstream, like the
> use of the fault_env structure,

Right, Kirill picked that up.

> but the rest of the code need some
> refresh to apply on the latest kernel. I'll try to update your series
> and will give it a try asap.
> 
> This being said, I'm wondering if the concern Kirill raised about the
> VMA sequence count handling are still valid...

Yes, I think they are. I don't think I put much time into it after that
exchange :-(

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]