On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 06:08:16PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> Currently we duplicate handling of shared write faults in
> wp_page_reuse() and do_shared_fault(). Factor them out into a common
> function.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
> ---
> mm/memory.c | 78 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------------
> 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
> index 63d9c1a54caf..0643b3b5a12a 100644
> --- a/mm/memory.c
> +++ b/mm/memory.c
> @@ -2063,6 +2063,41 @@ static int do_page_mkwrite(struct vm_area_struct *vma, struct page *page,
> }
>
> /*
> + * Handle dirtying of a page in shared file mapping on a write fault.
> + *
> + * The function expects the page to be locked and unlocks it.
> + */
> +static void fault_dirty_shared_page(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> + struct page *page)
> +{
> + struct address_space *mapping;
> + bool dirtied;
> + bool page_mkwrite = vma->vm_ops->page_mkwrite;
I think you may need to pass in a 'page_mkwrite' parameter if you don't want
to change behavior. Just checking to see of vma->vm_ops->page_mkwrite is
non-NULL works fine for this path:
do_shared_fault()
fault_dirty_shared_page()
and for
wp_page_shared()
wp_page_reuse()
fault_dirty_shared_page()
But for these paths:
wp_pfn_shared()
wp_page_reuse()
fault_dirty_shared_page()
and
do_wp_page()
wp_page_reuse()
fault_dirty_shared_page()
we unconditionally pass 0 for the 'page_mkwrite' parameter, even though from
the logic in wp_pfn_shared() especially you can see that
vma->vm_ops->pfn_mkwrite() must be defined some of the time.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>