Re: [PATCHv3 11/41] thp: try to free page's buffers before attempt split

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu 15-09-16 14:54:53, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> We want page to be isolated from the rest of the system before spliting
> it. We rely on page count to be 2 for file pages to make sure nobody
> uses the page: one pin to caller, one to radix-tree.
> 
> Filesystems with backing storage can have page count increased if it has
> buffers.
> 
> Let's try to free them, before attempt split. And remove one guarding
> VM_BUG_ON_PAGE().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
...
> @@ -2041,6 +2041,23 @@ int split_huge_page_to_list(struct page *page, struct list_head *list)
>  			goto out;
>  		}
>  
> +		/* Try to free buffers before attempt split */
> +		if (!PageSwapBacked(head) && PagePrivate(page)) {
> +			/*
> +			 * We cannot trigger writeback from here due possible
> +			 * recursion if triggered from vmscan, only wait.
> +			 *
> +			 * Caller can trigger writeback it on its own, if safe.
> +			 */
> +			wait_on_page_writeback(head);
> +
> +			if (page_has_buffers(head) &&
> +					!try_to_free_buffers(head)) {
> +				ret = -EBUSY;
> +				goto out;
> +			}

Shouldn't you rather use try_to_release_page() here? Because filesystems
have their ->releasepage() callbacks for freeing data associated with a
page. It is not guaranteed page private data are buffers although it is
true for ext4...

								Honza
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxxx>
SUSE Labs, CR

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]