On Thu, Oct 06, 2016 at 09:02:00AM -0700, Doug Smythies wrote: > It was my (limited) understanding that the subsequent 2 patch set > superseded this patch. Indeed, the 2 patch set seems to solve > both the SLAB and SLUB bug reports. It would mean that patch 1 solves both the SLAB and SLUB bug reports since patch 2 is only effective for SLUB. Reason that I send this patch is that although patch 1 fixes the issue that too many kworkers are created, kmem_cache creation/destory is still slowed by synchronize_sched() and it would cause kmemcg usage counting delayed. I'm not sure how bad it is but it's generally better to start accounting as soon as possible. With patch 2 for SLUB and this patch for SLAB, performance of kmem_cache creation/destory would recover. Thanks. > > References: > > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=172981 > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=172991 > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9361853 > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9359271 -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>