On Fri 23-09-16 10:07:09, Michal Hocko wrote: > On Thu 22-09-16 11:30:36, Janani Ravichandran wrote: > > > > > On Sep 19, 2016, at 5:42 AM, Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > On Tue 13-09-16 14:04:49, Janani Ravichandran wrote: > > >> > > >>> On Sep 12, 2016, at 8:16 AM, Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > >> > > >> I’m using the function graph tracer to see how long __alloc_pages_nodemask() > > >> took. > > > > > > How can you map the function graph tracer to a specif context? Let's say > > > I would like to know why a particular allocation took so long. Would > > > that be possible? > > > > Maybe not. If the latencies are due to direct reclaim or memory compaction, you > > get some information from the tracepoints (like mm_vmscan_direct_reclaim_begin, > > mm_compaction_begin, etc). But otherwise, you don’t get any context information. > > Function graph only gives the time spent in alloc_pages_nodemask() in that case. > > Then I really think that we need a starting trace point. I think that > having the full context information is really helpful in order to > understand latencies induced by allocations. Are you planning to pursue this path? -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>