On Mon 03-10-16 19:35:18, Florian Weimer wrote: > * Michal Hocko: > > >> I'm not sure if I can reproduce this issue in a sufficiently reliable > >> way, but I can try. (I still have not found the process which causes > >> the xfs_inode allocations go up.) > >> > >> Is linux-next still the tree to test? > > > > Yes it contains all the compaction related fixes which we believe to > > address recent higher order OOMs. > > I tried 4.7.5 instead. I could not reproduce the issue so far there. > Thanks to whoever fixed it. :) The 4.7 stable tree contains a workaround rather than the full fix we would like to have in 4.9. So if you can then testing the current linux-next would be really appreciated. -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>