Re: [PATCH] set_pgdat_percpu_threshold() don't use for_each_online_cpu

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 08:04:23AM -0600, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Nov 2010, Mel Gorman wrote:
> 
> > With recent per-cpu allocator changes, are we guaranteed that the per-cpu
> > structures exist and are valid?
> 
> We always guarantee that all per cpu areas for all possible cpus exist.
> That has always been the case. There was a discussion about changing
> that though. Could be difficult given the need for additional locking.
> 

In that case, I do not have any more concerns about the patch. It's
unfortunate that more per-cpu structures will have to be updated but I
doubt it'll be noticable.

-- 
Mel Gorman
Part-time Phd Student                          Linux Technology Center
University of Limerick                         IBM Dublin Software Lab

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom policy in Canada: sign http://dissolvethecrtc.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]