Re: [Bug 172981] New: [bisected] SLAB: extreme load averages and over 2000 kworker threads

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



(switched to email.  Please respond via emailed reply-to-all, not via the
bugzilla web interface).

On Tue, 27 Sep 2016 17:57:08 +0000 bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=172981
> 
>             Bug ID: 172981
>            Summary: [bisected] SLAB: extreme load averages and over 2000
>                     kworker threads
>            Product: Memory Management
>            Version: 2.5
>     Kernel Version: 4.7+
>           Hardware: All
>                 OS: Linux
>               Tree: Mainline
>             Status: NEW
>           Severity: normal
>           Priority: P1
>          Component: Slab Allocator
>           Assignee: akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>           Reporter: dsmythies@xxxxxxxxx
>         Regression: No
> 
> Immediately after boot, extreme load average numbers and over 2000 kworker
> processes are being observed on my main linux test computer (basically a Ubuntu
> 16.04 server, no GUI). The worker threads appear to be idle, and do disappear
> after the nominal 5 minute timeout, depending on whatever other stuff might run
> in the meantime. However, the number of threads can hugely increase again. The
> issue occurs with ease for kernels compiled using SLAB.
> 
> For SLAB, kernel bisection gave:
> 801faf0db8947e01877920e848a4d338dd7a99e7
> "mm/slab: lockless decision to grow cache"
> 
> The following monitoring script was used for the below examples:
> 
> #!/bin/dash
> 
> while [ 1 ];
> do
>   echo $(uptime) ::: $(ps -A --no-headers | wc -l) ::: $(ps aux | grep kworker
> | grep -v u | grep -v H | wc -l)
>   sleep 10.0
> done
> 
> Example (SLAB):
> 
> After boot:
> 
> 22:26:21 up 1 min, 2 users, load average: 295.98, 85.67, 29.47 ::: 2240 :::
> 2074
> 22:26:31 up 1 min, 2 users, load average: 250.47, 82.85, 29.15 ::: 2240 :::
> 2074
> 22:26:41 up 1 min, 2 users, load average: 211.96, 80.12, 28.84 ::: 2240 :::
> 2074
> ...
> 22:52:34 up 27 min, 3 users, load average: 0.00, 0.43, 5.40 ::: 165 ::: 17
> 22:52:44 up 27 min, 3 users, load average: 0.00, 0.42, 5.34 ::: 165 ::: 17
> 
> Now type: sudo echo "bla":
> 
> 22:53:14 up 27 min, 3 users, load average: 0.00, 0.38, 5.17 ::: 493 ::: 345
> 22:53:24 up 28 min, 3 users, load average: 0.00, 0.36, 5.11 ::: 493 ::: 345
> 
> Caused 328 new kworker threads.
> Now queue just a few (8 in this case) very simple jobs.
> 
> 22:55:45 up 30 min, 3 users, load average: 0.11, 0.27, 4.38 ::: 493 ::: 345
> 22:55:55 up 30 min, 3 users, load average: 0.09, 0.26, 4.34 ::: 2207 ::: 2059
> 22:56:05 up 30 min, 3 users, load average: 0.08, 0.25, 4.29 ::: 2207 ::: 2059
> 
> If I look at linux/Documentation/workqueue.txt and do:
> 
> echo workqueue:workqueue_queue_work > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/set_event
> 
> and:
> 
> cat /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/trace_pipe > out.txt
> 
> I get somewhere between 10,000 and 20,000 occurrences of
> memcg_kmem_cache_create_func in the file (using my simple test method).
> 
> Also tested with kernel 4.8-rc7.
> 
> -- 
> You are receiving this mail because:
> You are the assignee for the bug.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]