On 09/14/2016 09:41 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 08:45:44AM -0500, Tom Lendacky wrote: >> Currently, mem_encrypt.h only lives in the arch/x86 directory so it >> wouldn't be able to be included here without breaking other archs. > > I'm wondering if it would be simpler to move only sme_me_mask to an > arch-agnostic header just so that we save us all the code duplication. > > Hmmm. If I do that, then I could put an #ifdef in the header to include the asm/mem_encrypt.h if the memory encryption is configured, else set the value to zero. I'll look into this. One immediate question becomes do we keep the name very specific vs. making it more generic, sme_me_mask vs me_mask, etc. Thanks, Tom > -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>