On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 11:09:43AM -0400, Rik van Riel wrote: > > Patch looks ok other than the comment above the second hunk being out > > of > > date. Out of curiousity, what workload benefitted from this? I saw a > > mix > > of marginal results when I ran this on a 2-socket and 4-socket box. > > I did not performance test the change, because I believe > the VM_WRITE test has a small logical error. > > Specifically, VM_WRITE is also true for VMAs that are > PROT_WRITE|MAP_PRIVATE, which we do NOT want to group > on. Every shared library mapped on my system seems to > have a (small) read-write VMA: > Ok, while I agree with you, the patch is not a guaranteed win. However, in the event it is not, I agree that the problem will be with the grouping code. If the comment is updated then feel free to add my Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@xxxxxxx> -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>