On 09/08, kbuild test robot wrote: > > Hi Oleg, > > FYI, the error/warning still remains. I guess this is because you need to backport for_each_thread first ;) And probably a couple more commits before this one. > tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/sashal/linux-stable-security.git linux-3.12.y-security > head: aac46739e3b30a5e6a0ccb2820dfde1333e9f24b > commit: 9ac1e8708f42427bffe12c0f7f0813efe730a29d [590/1388] vm_is_stack: use for_each_thread() rather then buggy while_each_thread() > config: i386-randconfig-s1-201636 (attached as .config) > compiler: gcc-4.9 (Debian 4.9.3-14) 4.9.3 > reproduce: > git checkout 9ac1e8708f42427bffe12c0f7f0813efe730a29d > # save the attached .config to linux build tree > make ARCH=i386 > > All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): > > mm/util.c: In function 'vm_is_stack': > >> mm/util.c:277:3: error: implicit declaration of function 'for_each_thread' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] > for_each_thread(task, t) { > ^ > >> mm/util.c:277:28: error: expected ';' before '{' token > for_each_thread(task, t) { > ^ > cc1: some warnings being treated as errors > > vim +/for_each_thread +277 mm/util.c > > 271 return task->pid; > 272 > 273 if (in_group) { > 274 struct task_struct *t; > 275 > 276 rcu_read_lock(); > > 277 for_each_thread(task, t) { > 278 if (vm_is_stack_for_task(t, vma)) { > 279 ret = t->pid; > 280 goto done; > > --- > 0-DAY kernel test infrastructure Open Source Technology Center > https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all Intel Corporation -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>