On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 10:12 PM, Anshuman Khandual <khandual@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 09/06/2016 10:19 PM, Dan Williams wrote: >> Now that track_pfn_insert() is no longer used in the DAX path, it no >> longer needs to comprehend pfn_t values. >> >> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> arch/x86/mm/pat.c | 4 ++-- >> include/asm-generic/pgtable.h | 4 ++-- >> mm/memory.c | 2 +- >> 3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > A small nit. Should not the arch/x86/mm/pat.c changes be separated out > into a different patch ? Kind of faced little bit problem separating out > generic core mm changes to that of arch specific mm changes when going > through the commits in retrospect. I'm going to drop this change. Leaving it as is does no harm, and users of pfn_t are likely to grow over time. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>