On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 04:47:23PM +0300, Dmitry Safonov wrote: > Thanks for your replies Oleg, Cyrill, > > 2016-09-01 15:45 GMT+03:00 Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@xxxxxxxxx>: > > On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 02:27:44PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > >> > Hi Oleg, > >> > can I have your acks or reviewed-by tags for 4-5-6 patches in the series, > >> > or there is something left to fix? > >> > >> Well yes... Although let me repeat, I am not sure I personally like > >> the very idea of 3/6 and 6/6. But as I already said I do not feel I > >> understand the problem space enough, so I won't argue. > >> > >> However, let me ask again. Did you consider another option? Why criu > >> can't exec a dummy 32-bit binary before anything else? > > > > I'm not really sure how this would look then. If I understand you > > correctly you propose to exec dummy 32bit during "forking" stage > > where we're recreating a process tree, before anything else. If > > true this implies that we will need two criu engines: one compiled > > with 64 bit and (same) second but compiled with 32 bits, no? > > Yep, we would need then full CRIU, but compiled in 32 bits. > And it can be then even more complicated, as 64-bit parent > can have 32-bit child, which can have 64-bit child... et cetera. Yup, this gonna be a mess, that's why I asked, because I suspect Oleg meant something else maybe? -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>