Re: [PATCH v12 2/7] x86, acpi, cpu-hotplug: Enable acpi to register all possible cpus at boot time.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi tglx,

At 08/25/2016 04:35 PM, Dou Liyang wrote:
 arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c | 18 ++++++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c
index cea4fc1..e5612a9 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c
@@ -2024,7 +2024,7 @@ void disconnect_bsp_APIC(int virt_wire_setup)
 	apic_write(APIC_LVT1, value);
 }

-int generic_processor_info(int apicid, int version)
+static int __generic_processor_info(int apicid, int version, bool enabled)
 {
 	int cpu, max = nr_cpu_ids;
 	bool boot_cpu_detected = physid_isset(boot_cpu_physical_apicid,
@@ -2090,7 +2090,6 @@ int generic_processor_info(int apicid, int version)
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}

-	num_processors++;
 	if (apicid == boot_cpu_physical_apicid) {

I move the "num_processors++" below.
Because I think that if "apicid == boot_cpu_physical_apicid" is true,
The "disabled_cpus" will plus one that may conflict with the
"num_processors++"

Is my thought right?

 		/*
 		 * x86_bios_cpu_apicid is required to have processors listed
@@ -2113,6 +2112,7 @@ int generic_processor_info(int apicid, int version)

 		pr_warning("APIC: Package limit reached. Processor %d/0x%x ignored.\n",
 			   thiscpu, apicid);
+
 		disabled_cpus++;
 		return -ENOSPC;
 	}
@@ -2132,7 +2132,6 @@ int generic_processor_info(int apicid, int version)
 			apic_version[boot_cpu_physical_apicid], cpu, version);
 	}

-	physid_set(apicid, phys_cpu_present_map);
 	if (apicid > max_physical_apicid)
 		max_physical_apicid = apicid;

@@ -2145,11 +2144,22 @@ int generic_processor_info(int apicid, int version)
 		apic->x86_32_early_logical_apicid(cpu);
 #endif
 	set_cpu_possible(cpu, true);
-	set_cpu_present(cpu, true);
+
+	if (enabled) {
+		num_processors++;
+		physid_set(apicid, phys_cpu_present_map);
+		set_cpu_present(cpu, true);
+	} else
+		disabled_cpus++;


I remove all the "if (enabled)" code and do the unified
judgment here.

Thanks,
Dou


--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]