Re: [PATCH] proc, smaps: reduce printing overhead

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu 18-08-16 16:26:16, Michal Hocko wrote:
> b) doesn't it try to be overly clever when doing that in the caller
> doesn't cost all that much? Sure you can save few bytes in the spaces
> but then I would just argue to use \t rather than fixed string length.

ohh, I misread the code. It tries to emulate the width formater. But is
this really necessary? Do we know about any tools doing a fixed string
parsing?
-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]