On Mon, 25 Jul 2016 16:35:42 +0800 Dou Liyang <douly.fnst@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > [Problem] > > cpuid <-> nodeid mapping is firstly established at boot time. And workqueue caches > the mapping in wq_numa_possible_cpumask in wq_numa_init() at boot time. > > When doing node online/offline, cpuid <-> nodeid mapping is established/destroyed, > which means, cpuid <-> nodeid mapping will change if node hotplug happens. But > workqueue does not update wq_numa_possible_cpumask. > > So here is the problem: > > Assume we have the following cpuid <-> nodeid in the beginning: > > Node | CPU > ------------------------ > node 0 | 0-14, 60-74 > node 1 | 15-29, 75-89 > node 2 | 30-44, 90-104 > node 3 | 45-59, 105-119 > > and we hot-remove node2 and node3, it becomes: > > Node | CPU > ------------------------ > node 0 | 0-14, 60-74 > node 1 | 15-29, 75-89 > > and we hot-add node4 and node5, it becomes: > > Node | CPU > ------------------------ > node 0 | 0-14, 60-74 > node 1 | 15-29, 75-89 > node 4 | 30-59 > node 5 | 90-119 > > But in wq_numa_possible_cpumask, cpu30 is still mapped to node2, and the like. > > When a pool workqueue is initialized, if its cpumask belongs to a node, its > pool->node will be mapped to that node. And memory used by this workqueue will > also be allocated on that node. Plan B is to hunt down and fix up all the workqueue structures at hotplug-time. Has that option been evaluated? Your fix is x86-only and this bug presumably affects other architectures, yes? I think a "Plan B" would fix all architectures? Thirdly, what is the merge path for these patches? Is an x86 or ACPI maintainer working with you on them? -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>