On Fri, 22 Jul 2016 14:26:19 +0200 Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@xxxxxxx> wrote: > On 07/22/2016 08:37 AM, Michal Hocko wrote: > > On Thu 21-07-16 16:53:09, Michal Hocko wrote: > >> From d64815758c212643cc1750774e2751721685059a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > >> From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxx> > >> Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2016 16:40:59 +0200 > >> Subject: [PATCH] Revert "mm, mempool: only set __GFP_NOMEMALLOC if there are > >> free elements" > >> > >> This reverts commit f9054c70d28bc214b2857cf8db8269f4f45a5e23. > > > > I've noticed that Andrew has already picked this one up. Is anybody > > against marking it for stable? > > It would be strange to have different behavior with known regression in > 4.6 and 4.7 stables. Actually, there's still time for 4.7 proper? > I added the cc:stable. Do we need to bust a gut to rush it into 4.7? It sounds safer to let it bake for a while, fix it in 4.7.1? -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>