> > Yes, I've tested it, and it deprecates the tunable as expected. A single > > warning message serves the purpose well: let users know one time without > > being overly verbose that the tunable is deprecated and give them > > sufficient time (2 years) to start using the new tunable. That's how > > deprecation is done. > > no sense. > > Why do their application need to rewrite for *YOU*? Okey, you will got > benefit from your new knob. But NOBDOY use the new one. and People need > to rewrite their application even though no benefit. > > Don't do selfish userland breakage! And you said you ignore bug even though you have seen it. It suck! -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom policy in Canada: sign http://dissolvethecrtc.ca/ Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>