Re: mm/compact: why use low watermark to determine whether compact is finished instead of use high watermark?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 07/22/2016 10:56 AM, Xishi Qiu wrote:
Hi,

I find all the watermarks in mm/compaction.c are low_wmark_pages(),
so why not use high watermark to determine whether compact is finished?

Why would you use high watermark? Quite the opposite, I want to move towards min watermark (precisely, the one in alloc_flags which is usually min) in this series:

https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/6/24/222

especially:

https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/6/24/214

e.g.
__alloc_pages_nodemask()
	get_page_from_freelist()
	this is fast path, use use low_wmark_pages() in __zone_watermark_ok()

	__alloc_pages_slowpath()
	this is slow path, usually use min_wmark_pages()

Yes, and compaction should be finished when allocation can succeed, so match __alloc_pages_slowpath().


kswapd
	balance_pgdat()
	use high_wmark_pages() to determine whether zone is balanced

Thanks,
Xishi Qiu


--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]