Re: [patch 3/4] memcg: break out event counters from other stats

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 7:14 AM, Johannes Weiner <hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> For increasing and decreasing per-cpu cgroup usage counters it makes
>> sense to use signed types, as single per-cpu values might go negative
>> during updates. ÂBut this is not the case for only-ever-increasing
>> event counters.
>>
>> All the counters have been signed 64-bit so far, which was enough to
>> count events even with the sign bit wasted.
>>
>> The next patch narrows the usage counters type (on 32-bit CPUs, that
>> is), though, so break out the event counters and make them unsigned
>> words as they should have been from the start.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@xxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Greg Thelen <gthelen@xxxxxxxxxx>

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom policy in Canada: sign http://dissolvethecrtc.ca/
Don't email: <a href


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]