On Tuesday, July 19, 2016 03:28:06 PM Dou Liyang wrote:
> From: Gu Zheng <guz.fnst@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> The whole patch-set aims at making cpuid <-> nodeid mapping persistent. So that,
> when node online/offline happens, cache based on cpuid <-> nodeid mapping such as
> wq_numa_possible_cpumask will not cause any problem.
> It contains 4 steps:
> 1. Enable apic registeration flow to handle both enabled and disabled cpus.
> 2. Introduce a new array storing all possible cpuid <-> apicid mapping.
> 3. Enable _MAT and MADT relative apis to return non-presnet or disabled cpus' apicid.
> 4. Establish all possible cpuid <-> nodeid mapping.
>
> This patch finishes step 4.
>
> This patch set the persistent cpuid <-> nodeid mapping for all enabled/disabled
> processors at boot time via an additional acpi namespace walk for processors.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gu Zheng <guz.fnst@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Tang Chen <tangchen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Zhu Guihua <zhugh.fnst@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Dou Liyang <douly.fnst@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/ia64/kernel/acpi.c | 3 +-
> arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c | 4 ++-
> drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c | 5 ++++
> drivers/acpi/bus.c | 3 ++
> drivers/acpi/processor_core.c | 65 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> include/linux/acpi.h | 2 ++
> 6 files changed, 80 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/ia64/kernel/acpi.c b/arch/ia64/kernel/acpi.c
> index b1698bc..bb36515 100644
> --- a/arch/ia64/kernel/acpi.c
> +++ b/arch/ia64/kernel/acpi.c
> @@ -796,7 +796,7 @@ int acpi_isa_irq_to_gsi(unsigned isa_irq, u32 *gsi)
> * ACPI based hotplug CPU support
> */
> #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_HOTPLUG_CPU
> -static int acpi_map_cpu2node(acpi_handle handle, int cpu, int physid)
> +int acpi_map_cpu2node(acpi_handle handle, int cpu, int physid)
> {
> #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA
> /*
> @@ -811,6 +811,7 @@ static int acpi_map_cpu2node(acpi_handle handle, int cpu, int physid)
> #endif
> return 0;
> }
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(acpi_map_cpu2node);
>
> int additional_cpus __initdata = -1;
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c
> index 37248c3..0900264f 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c
> @@ -695,7 +695,7 @@ static void __init acpi_set_irq_model_ioapic(void)
> #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_HOTPLUG_CPU
> #include <acpi/processor.h>
>
> -static void acpi_map_cpu2node(acpi_handle handle, int cpu, int physid)
> +int acpi_map_cpu2node(acpi_handle handle, int cpu, int physid)
> {
> #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA
> int nid;
> @@ -706,7 +706,9 @@ static void acpi_map_cpu2node(acpi_handle handle, int cpu, int physid)
> numa_set_node(cpu, nid);
> }
> #endif
> + return 0;
> }
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(acpi_map_cpu2node);
>
> int acpi_map_cpu(acpi_handle handle, phys_cpuid_t physid, int *pcpu)
> {
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c
> index e85b19a..0c15828 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c
> @@ -182,6 +182,11 @@ int __weak arch_register_cpu(int cpu)
>
> void __weak arch_unregister_cpu(int cpu) {}
>
> +int __weak acpi_map_cpu2node(acpi_handle handle, int cpu, int physid)
> +{
> + return -ENODEV;
> +}
> +
> static int acpi_processor_hotadd_init(struct acpi_processor *pr)
> {
> unsigned long long sta;
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/bus.c b/drivers/acpi/bus.c
> index 262ca31..d8b7272 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/bus.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/bus.c
> @@ -1124,6 +1124,9 @@ static int __init acpi_init(void)
> acpi_sleep_proc_init();
> acpi_wakeup_device_init();
> acpi_debugger_init();
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_HOTPLUG_CPU
> + acpi_set_processor_mapping();
> +#endif
This doesn't look nice.
What about providing an empty definition of acpi_set_processor_mapping()
for CONFIG_ACPI_HOTPLUG_CPU unset?
> return 0;
> }
Thanks,
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>