On Wed, 13 Jul 2016 14:37:01 +0100 Mel Gorman <mgorman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I don't care strongly enough to cause a respin of half the series, and > > it's not your problem that I waited until the last revision went into > > mmots to review and comment. But if you agreed to a revert, would you > > consider tacking on a revert patch at the end of the series? > > > > In this case, I'm going to ask the other people on the cc for a > tie-breaker. If someone else prefers the old names then I'm happy for > your patch to be applied on top with my ack instead of respinning the > whole series. > > Anyone for a tie breaker? I am aggressively undecided. I guess as it's a bit of a 51/49 situation, the "stay with what people are familiar with" benefit tips the balance toward the legacy names? -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>