On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 09:47:42AM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote: > On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 10:29:09AM -0400, Johannes Weiner wrote: > > > + /* > > > + * If the number of buffer_heads in the machine exceeds the > > > + * maximum allowed level then reclaim from all zones. This is > > > + * not specific to highmem as highmem may not exist but it is > > > + * it is expected that buffer_heads are stripped in writeback. > > > > The mention of highmem in this comment make only sense within the > > context of this diff; it'll be pretty confusing in the standalone > > code. > > > > Also, double "it is" :) > > Is this any better? Yes, this is great! Thank you. > Note that it's marked as a fix to a later patch to reduce collisions in > mmotm. It's not a bisection risk so I saw little need to cause > unnecessary conflicts for Andrew. That seems completely reasonable to me. > ---8<--- > mm, vmscan: Have kswapd reclaim from all zones if reclaiming and buffer_heads_over_limit -fix > > Johannes reported that the comment about buffer_heads_over_limit in > balance_pgdat only made sense in the context of the patch. This > patch clarifies the reasoning and how it applies to 32 and 64 bit > systems. > > This is a fix to the mmotm patch > mm-vmscan-have-kswapd-reclaim-from-all-zones-if-reclaiming-and-buffer_heads_over_limit.patch > > Suggested-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx> -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>