Re: [PATCH 8/8] mm,oom_reaper: Make OOM reaper use list of mm_struct.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun 03-07-16 11:41:59, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> >From ce97a7f6b94a6003bc2b41e5f69da2fedc934a9d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Sat, 2 Jul 2016 23:10:06 +0900
> Subject: [PATCH 8/8] mm,oom_reaper: Make OOM reaper use list of mm_struct.
> 
> Since OOM reaping is per mm_struct operation, it is natural to use
> list of mm_struct used by OOM victims.

I would expect that this would be an immediate follow up for "[PATCH 3/8]
mm,oom: Use list of mm_struct used by OOM victims."

> This patch eliminates find_lock_task_mm() usage from the OOM reaper.

It would be good to explain what are the consequences.

> This patch fixes what commit 36324a990cf578b5 ("oom: clear TIF_MEMDIE
> after oom_reaper managed to unmap the address space") and
> commit 449d777d7ad6d7f9 ("mm, oom_reaper: clear TIF_MEMDIE for all tasks
> queued for oom_reaper") tried to address, by always calling exit_oom_mm()
> after OOM reap attempt was made.

And rather than mentioning the above two commits it would be better to
explain what is the difference wrt. to the current implementation.

Other than that it looks good to me.

> 
> Signed-off-by: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  include/linux/oom.h   |  8 -----
>  include/linux/sched.h |  3 --
>  mm/memcontrol.c       |  1 -
>  mm/oom_kill.c         | 84 +++++++++++++++++----------------------------------
>  4 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 69 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/oom.h b/include/linux/oom.h
> index 4844325..1a212c1 100644
> --- a/include/linux/oom.h
> +++ b/include/linux/oom.h
> @@ -71,14 +71,6 @@ static inline bool oom_task_origin(const struct task_struct *p)
>  
>  extern void mark_oom_victim(struct task_struct *tsk, struct oom_control *oc);
>  
> -#ifdef CONFIG_MMU
> -extern void wake_oom_reaper(struct task_struct *tsk);
> -#else
> -static inline void wake_oom_reaper(struct task_struct *tsk)
> -{
> -}
> -#endif
> -
>  extern unsigned long oom_badness(struct task_struct *p,
>  		struct mem_cgroup *memcg, const nodemask_t *nodemask,
>  		unsigned long totalpages);
> diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
> index f472f27..4379279 100644
> --- a/include/linux/sched.h
> +++ b/include/linux/sched.h
> @@ -1916,9 +1916,6 @@ struct task_struct {
>  	unsigned long	task_state_change;
>  #endif
>  	int pagefault_disabled;
> -#ifdef CONFIG_MMU
> -	struct task_struct *oom_reaper_list;
> -#endif
>  /* CPU-specific state of this task */
>  	struct thread_struct thread;
>  /*
> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> index c17160d..9acc840 100644
> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> @@ -1236,7 +1236,6 @@ static bool mem_cgroup_out_of_memory(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, gfp_t gfp_mask,
>  	 */
>  	if (task_will_free_mem(current)) {
>  		mark_oom_victim(current, &oc);
> -		wake_oom_reaper(current);
>  		goto unlock;
>  	}
>  
> diff --git a/mm/oom_kill.c b/mm/oom_kill.c
> index 317ce2c..bdc192f 100644
> --- a/mm/oom_kill.c
> +++ b/mm/oom_kill.c
> @@ -468,8 +468,6 @@ bool process_shares_mm(struct task_struct *p, struct mm_struct *mm)
>   * victim (if that is possible) to help the OOM killer to move on.
>   */
>  static DECLARE_WAIT_QUEUE_HEAD(oom_reaper_wait);
> -static struct task_struct *oom_reaper_list;
> -static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(oom_reaper_lock);
>  
>  static bool __oom_reap_vmas(struct mm_struct *mm)
>  {
> @@ -540,30 +538,27 @@ static bool __oom_reap_vmas(struct mm_struct *mm)
>  }
>  
>  #define MAX_OOM_REAP_RETRIES 10
> -static void oom_reap_task(struct task_struct *tsk)
> +static void oom_reap_vmas(struct mm_struct *mm)
>  {
>  	int attempts = 0;
> -	struct mm_struct *mm = NULL;
> -	struct task_struct *p = find_lock_task_mm(tsk);
> +	bool ret;
>  
>  	/*
> -	 * Make sure we find the associated mm_struct even when the particular
> -	 * thread has already terminated and cleared its mm.
> -	 * We might have race with exit path so consider our work done if there
> -	 * is no mm.
> +	 * Check MMF_OOM_REAPED after holding oom_lock because
> +	 * oom_kill_process() might find this mm pinned.
>  	 */
> -	if (!p)
> -		goto done;
> -	mm = p->mm;
> -	atomic_inc(&mm->mm_count);
> -	task_unlock(p);
> +	mutex_lock(&oom_lock);
> +	ret = test_bit(MMF_OOM_REAPED, &mm->flags);
> +	mutex_unlock(&oom_lock);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return;
>  
>  	/* Retry the down_read_trylock(mmap_sem) a few times */
>  	while (attempts++ < MAX_OOM_REAP_RETRIES && !__oom_reap_vmas(mm))
>  		schedule_timeout_idle(HZ/10);
>  
>  	if (attempts <= MAX_OOM_REAP_RETRIES)
> -		goto done;
> +		return;
>  
>  	pr_info("oom_reaper: unable to reap pid:%d (%s)\n",
>  		mm->oom_mm.pid, mm->oom_mm.comm);
> @@ -580,51 +575,30 @@ static void oom_reap_task(struct task_struct *tsk)
>  		set_bit(MMF_OOM_REAPED, &mm->flags);
>  	}
>  	debug_show_all_locks();
> -
> -done:
> -	tsk->oom_reaper_list = NULL;
> -	/* Drop a reference taken by wake_oom_reaper */
> -	put_task_struct(tsk);
> -	/* Drop a reference taken above. */
> -	if (mm)
> -		mmdrop(mm);
>  }
>  
>  static int oom_reaper(void *unused)
>  {
>  	while (true) {
> -		struct task_struct *tsk = NULL;
> -
> -		wait_event_freezable(oom_reaper_wait, oom_reaper_list != NULL);
> -		spin_lock(&oom_reaper_lock);
> -		if (oom_reaper_list != NULL) {
> -			tsk = oom_reaper_list;
> -			oom_reaper_list = tsk->oom_reaper_list;
> -		}
> -		spin_unlock(&oom_reaper_lock);
> -
> -		if (tsk)
> -			oom_reap_task(tsk);
> +		struct mm_struct *mm = NULL;
> +
> +		wait_event_freezable(oom_reaper_wait,
> +				     !list_empty(&oom_mm_list));
> +		spin_lock(&oom_mm_lock);
> +		if (!list_empty(&oom_mm_list))
> +			mm = list_first_entry(&oom_mm_list, struct mm_struct,
> +					      oom_mm.list);
> +		spin_unlock(&oom_mm_lock);
> +		if (!mm)
> +			continue;
> +		oom_reap_vmas(mm);
> +		/* Drop a reference taken by mark_oom_victim(). */
> +		exit_oom_mm(mm);
>  	}
>  
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> -void wake_oom_reaper(struct task_struct *tsk)
> -{
> -	/* tsk is already queued? */
> -	if (tsk == oom_reaper_list || tsk->oom_reaper_list)
> -		return;
> -
> -	get_task_struct(tsk);
> -
> -	spin_lock(&oom_reaper_lock);
> -	tsk->oom_reaper_list = oom_reaper_list;
> -	oom_reaper_list = tsk;
> -	spin_unlock(&oom_reaper_lock);
> -	wake_up(&oom_reaper_wait);
> -}
> -
>  static int __init oom_init(void)
>  {
>  	kthread_run(oom_reaper, NULL, "oom_reaper");
> @@ -667,6 +641,9 @@ void mark_oom_victim(struct task_struct *tsk, struct oom_control *oc)
>  		mm->oom_mm.pid = task_pid_nr(tsk);
>  #endif
>  		list_add_tail(&mm->oom_mm.list, &oom_mm_list);
> +#ifdef CONFIG_MMU
> +		wake_up(&oom_reaper_wait);
> +#endif
>  	}
>  	spin_unlock(&oom_mm_lock);
>  	/*
> @@ -816,7 +793,6 @@ void oom_kill_process(struct oom_control *oc, struct task_struct *p,
>  	unsigned int victim_points = 0;
>  	static DEFINE_RATELIMIT_STATE(oom_rs, DEFAULT_RATELIMIT_INTERVAL,
>  					      DEFAULT_RATELIMIT_BURST);
> -	bool can_oom_reap = true;
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * If the task is already exiting, don't alarm the sysadmin or kill
> @@ -825,7 +801,6 @@ void oom_kill_process(struct oom_control *oc, struct task_struct *p,
>  	task_lock(p);
>  	if (task_will_free_mem(p)) {
>  		mark_oom_victim(p, oc);
> -		wake_oom_reaper(p);
>  		task_unlock(p);
>  		put_task_struct(p);
>  		return;
> @@ -915,7 +890,6 @@ void oom_kill_process(struct oom_control *oc, struct task_struct *p,
>  			 * memory might be still used. Hide the mm from the oom
>  			 * killer to guarantee OOM forward progress.
>  			 */
> -			can_oom_reap = false;
>  			set_bit(MMF_OOM_REAPED, &mm->flags);
>  			pr_info("oom killer %d (%s) has mm pinned by %d (%s)\n",
>  					task_pid_nr(victim), victim->comm,
> @@ -926,9 +900,6 @@ void oom_kill_process(struct oom_control *oc, struct task_struct *p,
>  	}
>  	rcu_read_unlock();
>  
> -	if (can_oom_reap)
> -		wake_oom_reaper(victim);
> -
>  	mmdrop(mm);
>  	put_task_struct(victim);
>  }
> @@ -1004,7 +975,6 @@ bool out_of_memory(struct oom_control *oc)
>  	 */
>  	if (task_will_free_mem(current)) {
>  		mark_oom_victim(current, oc);
> -		wake_oom_reaper(current);
>  		return true;
>  	}
>  
> -- 
> 1.8.3.1

-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]