Currently, save_trace() can only save current context's stack trace. However, it would be useful if it can save(copy from) another context's stack trace. Especially, it can be used by crossrelease feature. Signed-off-by: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@xxxxxxx> --- kernel/locking/lockdep.c | 22 ++++++++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c index c596bef..b03014b 100644 --- a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c +++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c @@ -389,7 +389,7 @@ static void print_lockdep_off(const char *bug_msg) #endif } -static int save_trace(struct stack_trace *trace) +static int save_trace(struct stack_trace *trace, struct stack_trace *copy) { trace->nr_entries = 0; trace->max_entries = MAX_STACK_TRACE_ENTRIES - nr_stack_trace_entries; @@ -397,7 +397,13 @@ static int save_trace(struct stack_trace *trace) trace->skip = 3; - save_stack_trace(trace); + if (copy) { + trace->nr_entries = min(copy->nr_entries, trace->max_entries); + trace->skip = copy->skip; + memcpy(trace->entries, copy->entries, + trace->nr_entries * sizeof(unsigned long)); + } else + save_stack_trace(trace); /* * Some daft arches put -1 at the end to indicate its a full trace. @@ -1201,7 +1207,7 @@ static noinline int print_circular_bug(struct lock_list *this, if (!debug_locks_off_graph_unlock() || debug_locks_silent) return 0; - if (!save_trace(&this->trace)) + if (!save_trace(&this->trace, NULL)) return 0; depth = get_lock_depth(target); @@ -1547,13 +1553,13 @@ print_bad_irq_dependency(struct task_struct *curr, printk("\nthe dependencies between %s-irq-safe lock", irqclass); printk(" and the holding lock:\n"); - if (!save_trace(&prev_root->trace)) + if (!save_trace(&prev_root->trace, NULL)) return 0; print_shortest_lock_dependencies(backwards_entry, prev_root); printk("\nthe dependencies between the lock to be acquired"); printk(" and %s-irq-unsafe lock:\n", irqclass); - if (!save_trace(&next_root->trace)) + if (!save_trace(&next_root->trace, NULL)) return 0; print_shortest_lock_dependencies(forwards_entry, next_root); @@ -1885,7 +1891,7 @@ check_prev_add(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *prev, } if (!own_trace && stack_saved && !*stack_saved) { - if (!save_trace(&trace)) + if (!save_trace(&trace, NULL)) return 0; *stack_saved = 1; } @@ -2436,7 +2442,7 @@ print_irq_inversion_bug(struct task_struct *curr, lockdep_print_held_locks(curr); printk("\nthe shortest dependencies between 2nd lock and 1st lock:\n"); - if (!save_trace(&root->trace)) + if (!save_trace(&root->trace, NULL)) return 0; print_shortest_lock_dependencies(other, root); @@ -3015,7 +3021,7 @@ static int mark_lock(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *this, hlock_class(this)->usage_mask |= new_mask; - if (!save_trace(hlock_class(this)->usage_traces + new_bit)) + if (!save_trace(hlock_class(this)->usage_traces + new_bit, NULL)) return 0; switch (new_bit) { -- 1.9.1 -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx"> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>