Re: [PATCH 00/17] [RFC] soft and dynamic dirty throttling limits

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Nov 04, 2010 at 11:41:19AM +0800, Wu Fengguang wrote:
> I'm feeling relatively good about the first 14 patches to do IO-less
> balance_dirty_pages() and larger writeback chunk size. I'll repost
> them separately as v2 after returning to Shanghai.

Going for as small as possible patchsets is a pretty good idea.  Just
getting the I/O less balance_dirty_pages on it's own would be a really
good start, as that's one of the really criticial pieces of
infrastructure that a lot of people are waiting for.  Getting it into
linux-mm/linux-next ASAP so that it gets a lot of testing would be
highly useful.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom policy in Canada: sign http://dissolvethecrtc.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]