On Tue, Jul 05, 2016 at 09:14:05AM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 05, 2016 at 08:50:18AM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
> > > @@ -172,13 +174,17 @@ void refresh_zone_stat_thresholds(void)
> > > int threshold;
> > >
> > > for_each_populated_zone(zone) {
> > > + struct pglist_data *pgdat = zone->zone_pgdat;
> > > unsigned long max_drift, tolerate_drift;
> > >
> > > threshold = calculate_normal_threshold(zone);
> > >
> > > - for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
> > > + for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
> > > per_cpu_ptr(zone->pageset, cpu)->stat_threshold
> > > = threshold;
> > > + per_cpu_ptr(pgdat->per_cpu_nodestats, cpu)->stat_threshold
> > > + = threshold;
> > > + }
> >
> > I didn't see other patches yet so it might fix it then.
> >
> > per_cpu_nodestats is per node not zone but it use per-zone threshold
> > and even overwritten by next zones. I don't think it's not intended.
>
> It was intended that the threshold from one zone would be used but now
> that you point it out, it would use the threshold for the smallest zone
> in the node which is sub-optimal. I applied the patch below on top to
> use the threshold from the largest zone. I considered using the sum of
> all thresholds but feared it might allow too much per-cpu drift. It can
> be switched to the sum if we find a case where vmstat updates are too
> high.
Fair enough.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>