On Mon, Jul 04, 2016 at 02:45:24PM +0900, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote: > On (07/04/16 14:29), Joonsoo Kim wrote: > > > > On Sun, Jul 03, 2016 at 01:16:56AM +0900, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote: > > > > > Introduce PAGE_OWNER_TRACK_FREE config option to extend page owner with > > > > > free_pages() tracking functionality. This adds to the dump_page_owner() > > > > > output an additional backtrace, that tells us what path has freed the > > > > > page. > > > > > > > > Hmm... Do you have other ideas to use this feature? Following example is > > > > just to detect use-after-free and we have other good tools for it > > > > (KASAN or DEBUG_PAGEALLOC) so I'm not sure whether it's useful or not. > > > > > > there is no kasan for ARM32, for example (apart from the fact that > > > it's really hard to use kasan sometimes due to its cpu cycles and > > > memory requirements). > > > > Hmm... for debugging purpose, KASAN provides many more things so IMO it's > > better to implement/support KASAN in ARM32 rather than expand > > PAGE_OWNER for free. > > > > hm, the last time I checked kasan didn't catch that extra put_page() on Indeed. It seems that kasan only catch double-free of slab object. > x86_64. AFAIK, kasan on ARM32 is a bit hard to do properly > http://www.serverphorums.com/read.php?12,1206479,1281087#msg-1281087 Okay. > I've played with kasan on arm32 (an internal custom version)... and > extended page_owner turned out to be *incomparably* easier and faster > to use (especially paired with stackdepot). Okay. > > > > educate me, will DEBUG_PAGEALLOC tell us what path has triggered the > > > extra put_page()? hm... does ARM32 provide ARCH_SUPPORTS_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC? > > > > Hmm... Now, I notice that PAGE_OWNER_TRACK_FREE will detect > > double-free rather than use-after-free. > > well, yes. current hits bad_page(), page_owner helps to find out who > stole and spoiled it from under current. > > CPU a CPU b > > alloc_page() > put_page() << legitimate > alloc_page() > err: > put_page() << legitimate, again. > << but is actually buggy. > > put_page() << double free. but we need > << to report put_page() from > << CPU a. Okay. I think that this patch make finding offending user easier but it looks like it is a partial solution to detect double-free. See following example. CPU a CPU b alloc_page() put_page() << legitimate alloc_page() err: put_page() << legitimate, again. << but is actually buggy. alloc_page() put_page() << legitimate, again. put_page() << Will report the bug and page_owner have legitimate call stack. In kasan, quarantine is used to provide some delay for real free and it makes use-after-free detection more robust. Double-free also can be benefit from it. Anyway, I will not object more since it looks the simplest way to improve doublue-free detection for the page at least for now. Thanks. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>