Re: JITs and 52-bit VA

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 12:56:56PM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
> 
> Yeah, cgroups don't make a lot of sense.
> 
> On x86, the 48-bit virtual address is even hard-coded in the ABI[1].  So
> we can't change *any* program's layout without either breaking the ABI
> or having it opt in.
> 
> But, we're also lucky to only have one VA layout since day one.
> 
> 1. www.x86-64.org/documentation/abi.pdf - “... Therefore, conforming
> processes may only use addresses from 0x00000000 00000000 to 0x00007fff
> ffffffff .”

Yes, but noone forces you to write conforming programs ;)
After all while hw allows you to run VA with bits > than
48 it's fine, all side effects of breaking abi is up to
program author (iirc on x86 there is up to 52 bits on
hw level allowed, don't have specs under my hands?)

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]