Lukasz Anaczkowski <lukasz.anaczkowski@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> From: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> static inline pte_t huge_ptep_get_and_clear(struct mm_struct *mm,
> unsigned long addr, pte_t *ptep)
> {
> - return ptep_get_and_clear(mm, addr, ptep);
> + pte_t pte = ptep_get_and_clear(mm, addr, ptep);
> +
> + if (boot_cpu_has_bug(X86_BUG_PTE_LEAK))
> + fix_pte_leak(mm, addr, ptep);
> + return pte;
> }
I missed it on the previous iteration: ptep_get_and_clear already calls
fix_pte_leak when needed. So do you need to call it again here?
Thanks,
Nadav
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>