On 06/14/2016 10:01 AM, Lukasz Anaczkowski wrote:
> v2 (Lukasz Anaczkowski):
> () fixed compilation breakage
...
By unconditionally defining the workaround code, even on kernels where
there is no chance of ever hitting this bug. I think that's a pretty
poor way to do it.
Can we please stick this in one of the intel.c files, so it's only
present on CPU_SUP_INTEL builds?
Which reminds me...
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable_64.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable_64.h
> @@ -178,6 +178,12 @@ extern void cleanup_highmap(void);
> extern void init_extra_mapping_uc(unsigned long phys, unsigned long size);
> extern void init_extra_mapping_wb(unsigned long phys, unsigned long size);
>
> +#define ARCH_HAS_NEEDS_SWAP_PTL 1
> +static inline bool arch_needs_swap_ptl(void)
> +{
> + return boot_cpu_has_bug(X86_BUG_PTE_LEAK);
> +}
Does this *REALLY* only affect 64-bit kernels?
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>