Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 10:42 AM, Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Following this patch, if (current->active_mm != mm), flush_tlb_page() still >> doesn’t call smp_mb() before checking mm_cpumask(mm). >> >> In contrast, flush_tlb_mm_range() does call smp_mb(). >> >> Is there a reason for this discrepancy? > > Not that I can remember. Is the remote flush case likely to be racy? You replied separately on another email that included a patch to fix this case. It turns out smp_mb is not needed on flush_tlb_page, since the PTE is always updated using an atomic operation. Yet, a compiler barrier is still needed, so I added smp_mb__after_atomic instead. Nadav -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href