From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxx>
The only case where the oom_reaper is not triggered for the oom victim
is when it shares the memory with a kernel thread (aka use_mm) or with
the global init. After "mm, oom: skip vforked tasks from being selected"
the victim cannot be a vforked task of the global init so we are left
with clone(CLONE_VM) (without CLONE_SIGHAND). use_mm() users are quite
rare as well.
In order to guarantee a forward progress for the OOM killer make
sure that this really rare cases will not get into the way and hide
the mm from the oom killer by setting MMF_OOM_REAPED flag for it.
oom_scan_process_thread will ignore any TIF_MEMDIE task if it has
MMF_OOM_REAPED flag set to catch these oom victims.
After this patch we should guarantee a forward progress for the OOM
killer even when the selected victim is sharing memory with a kernel
thread or global init.
Changes since v1
- do not exit_oom_victim because oom_scan_process_thread will handle
those which couldn't terminate in time. exit_oom_victim is not safe
wrt. oom_disable synchronization.
Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxx>
---
mm/oom_kill.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/oom_kill.c b/mm/oom_kill.c
index 3e35d2a487cf..6303bc7caeda 100644
--- a/mm/oom_kill.c
+++ b/mm/oom_kill.c
@@ -283,10 +283,22 @@ enum oom_scan_t oom_scan_process_thread(struct oom_control *oc,
/*
* This task already has access to memory reserves and is being killed.
- * Don't allow any other task to have access to the reserves.
+ * Don't allow any other task to have access to the reserves unless
+ * the task has MMF_OOM_REAPED because chances that it would release
+ * any memory is quite low.
*/
- if (!is_sysrq_oom(oc) && atomic_read(&task->signal->oom_victims))
- return OOM_SCAN_ABORT;
+ if (!is_sysrq_oom(oc) && atomic_read(&task->signal->oom_victims)) {
+ struct task_struct *p = find_lock_task_mm(task);
+ enum oom_scan_t ret = OOM_SCAN_ABORT;
+
+ if (p) {
+ if (test_bit(MMF_OOM_REAPED, &p->mm->flags))
+ ret = OOM_SCAN_CONTINUE;
+ task_unlock(p);
+ }
+
+ return ret;
+ }
/*
* If task is allocating a lot of memory and has been marked to be
@@ -913,9 +925,14 @@ void oom_kill_process(struct oom_control *oc, struct task_struct *p,
/*
* We cannot use oom_reaper for the mm shared by this
* process because it wouldn't get killed and so the
- * memory might be still used.
+ * memory might be still used. Hide the mm from the oom
+ * killer to guarantee OOM forward progress.
*/
can_oom_reap = false;
+ set_bit(MMF_OOM_REAPED, &mm->flags);
+ pr_info("oom killer %d (%s) has mm pinned by %d (%s)\n",
+ task_pid_nr(victim), victim->comm,
+ task_pid_nr(p), p->comm);
continue;
}
do_send_sig_info(SIGKILL, SEND_SIG_FORCED, p, true);
--
2.8.1
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>